2018 Ratings as of September 24, 10:57 am
by Average Computer Rating (ACR)

Division 2

Atlantic  North  South    All

1West Chester4-1 99.90.7160.757
2East Stroudsburg4-1 99.50.6960.750
3Stonehill4-1 99.40.7380.757
4Millersville3-1 98.40.5780.487
5Merrimack4-1 98.20.5420.370
6Bloomsburg3-1 97.80.6280.650
7Assumption4-2 97.50.6080.614
8Slippery Rock4-1 97.30.5270.347
9Queens (NC)4-1 97.20.5800.513
10Shippensburg4-1 97.20.5620.460
11Pace5-1 97.10.5430.406
12Kutztown5-1 97.10.5340.364
13Lindenwood5-1 97.10.5800.478
14Bentley5-2 96.70.5830.557
15LIU Post3-2 96.30.5370.483
16Limestone2-3 95.90.4890.580
17Franklin Pierce3-3 95.70.5100.556
18Mansfield4-2 95.60.4690.367
19Belmont Abbey1-2 95.60.5410.700
20Saint Anselm2-3 95.40.4780.550
21Bellarmine4-2 95.40.4600.294
22Adelphi2-3 95.30.4830.513
23Southern New Hampshire3-3 95.20.4670.411
24Molloy3-4 95.10.4350.422
25Newberry3-3 95.10.4530.433
26IUP1-5 94.70.4510.603
27St. Thomas Aquinas2-6 94.00.4200.454
28Saint Michael's1-4 93.90.3680.400
29Mercyhurst1-4 93.70.3560.350
30Seton Hill0-4 93.40.4570.704
31Mercy0-6 93.20.3870.565
32Coker0-2 93.00.2890.325
33American International0-3 92.60.3710.548
34Converse0-3 92.30.3490.472
35Southern Connecticut0-6 92.10.3830.542
36New Haven0-4 91.50.3320.433

1Team Records: Only divisional games are included in the records here.  The same holds true for the three ratings described below.

2Average Computer Rating: An equal weighting of two computer ratings, one based solely on goal differentials (with a 5-goal limit to greatly reduce any effects of "running up the score") and one based solely on wins and losses

3Ratings Percentage Index = 0.25*W/L pct. + 0.50*SOS + 0.25*opponents' SOS

4Strength of Schedule = Avg. of opponents' W/L pct. when not playing that team

  • Click the column headers to sort the table by that field (in descending order for ratings and alphabetically for teams).

  • In the case of opponent's record in RPI and SOS, games involving the target team have been removed.

  • Calculations are provided only for entertainment purposes.  The ACR has no bearing on tournament selection, while the NCAA's official SOS and RPI are produced and published in October and November.

  • Formulas are constant across schools, allowing comparisons to be valid.