FieldHockeyCorner.com

2026 Ratings as of October 4, 11:26 pm
by Strength of Schedule (SOS)

Division 3

III

I  II III IV  V  VI    All

RankTeamRecord1ACR2RPI3SOS4
1New Paltz3-7 94.60.5710.727
2William Smith5-7 95.60.5660.649
3Vassar6-4 96.50.6160.641
4Rochester7-4 95.60.5970.621
5Ithaca10-2 96.90.6340.581
6Cortland8-1 97.70.6670.580
7St. Lawrence3-7 93.00.4700.541
8Geneseo7-3 96.20.5830.541
9Hartwick5-4 94.20.5300.535
10Union7-3 95.70.5840.530
11Penn State Harrisburg5-5 92.80.4940.508
12RPI8-2 96.00.5970.506
13Utica0-9 90.50.3620.502
14Russell Sage4-6 91.50.4600.499
15Oswego4-6 91.90.4630.493
16Skidmore4-6 94.60.4840.492
17St. John Fisher5-5 93.30.4800.468
18Keuka0-8 88.50.3360.461
19Brockport8-2 93.60.5440.456
20Nazareth1-7 89.60.3690.436
21Oneonta5-4 93.30.4600.412
22Houghton7-1 94.10.5410.401
23Hartford3-7 90.10.3740.375
24Morrisville4-5 91.40.4100.366
25Washington & Jefferson1-6 86.80.3100.337
26Alfred0-1 86.70.2910.333
27Elmira3-5 89.30.3450.295

1Team Records: Only divisional games are included in the records here.  The same holds true for the three ratings described below.

2Average Computer Rating: An equal weighting of two computer ratings, one based solely on goal differentials (with a 5-goal limit to greatly reduce any effects of "running up the score") and one based solely on wins and losses

3Ratings Percentage Index = 0.25*W/L pct. + 0.50*SOS + 0.25*opponents' SOS

4Strength of Schedule = Avg. of opponents' W/L pct. when not playing that team

Notes
  • Click the column headers to sort the table by that field (in descending order for ratings and alphabetically for teams).


  • In the case of opponent's record in RPI and SOS, games involving the target team have been removed.


  • Calculations are provided only for entertainment purposes.  The ACR has no bearing on tournament selection, while the NCAA's official SOS and RPI are produced and published in October and November.


  • Formulas are constant across schools, allowing comparisons to be valid.


Home