| Rank | Team | Record1 | ACR2 | RPI3 | SOS4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Salisbury | 20-2 | 98.8 | 0.690 | 0.617 |
| 2 | Ursinus | 17-3 | 98.7 | 0.674 | 0.615 |
| 3 | Christopher Newport | 15-2 | 98.2 | 0.673 | 0.603 |
| 4 | Johns Hopkins | 14-6 | 97.6 | 0.637 | 0.616 |
| 5 | Lynchburg | 19-4 | 96.8 | 0.586 | 0.506 |
| 6 | Gettysburg | 11-7 | 96.7 | 0.580 | 0.570 |
| 7 | Saint Mary's-MD | 12-5 | 96.4 | 0.581 | 0.539 |
| 8 | Franklin & Marshall | 12-7 | 96.3 | 0.568 | 0.547 |
| 9 | Muhlenberg | 12-7 | 96.0 | 0.546 | 0.518 |
| 10 | Catholic | 11-9 | 95.9 | 0.557 | 0.559 |
| 11 | Wesley | 12-5 | 95.8 | 0.555 | 0.505 |
| 12 | Washington & Lee | 11-7 | 95.5 | 0.546 | 0.525 |
| 13 | Mary Washington | 11-9 | 95.4 | 0.543 | 0.541 |
| 14 | Eastern Mennonite | 10-7 | 95.1 | 0.544 | 0.529 |
| 15 | Dickinson | 8-9 | 95.0 | 0.515 | 0.530 |
| 16 | Frostburg | 11-6 | 94.8 | 0.542 | 0.507 |
| 17 | McDaniel | 6-12 | 94.7 | 0.517 | 0.578 |
| 18 | Swarthmore | 6-11 | 94.0 | 0.473 | 0.513 |
| 19 | Haverford | 7-11 | 93.9 | 0.471 | 0.499 |
| 20 | Washington | 6-11 | 93.8 | 0.456 | 0.490 |
| 21 | Randolph-Macon | 7-11 | 93.6 | 0.469 | 0.496 |
| 22 | York | 6-15 | 93.5 | 0.499 | 0.570 |
| 23 | Villa Julie | 5-13 | 93.0 | 0.448 | 0.505 |
| 24 | Virginia Wesleyan | 4-12 | 92.9 | 0.450 | 0.517 |
| 25 | Bridgewater | 4-13 | 92.5 | 0.449 | 0.520 |
| 26 | Roanoke | 3-10 | 92.3 | 0.412 | 0.473 |
| 27 | Goucher | 3-13 | 91.8 | 0.374 | 0.436 |
| 28 | Wilson | 8-7 | 91.5 | 0.379 | 0.328 |
| 29 | Shenandoah | 1-10 | 91.2 | 0.396 | 0.498 |
| 30 | Bryn Mawr | 2-12 | 91.0 | 0.392 | 0.475 |
| 31 | Hood | 3-11 | 91.0 | 0.367 | 0.418 |
| 32 | Sweet Briar | 2-14 | 90.3 | 0.341 | 0.413 |
| 33 | Hendrix | 0-13 | 90.1 | 0.365 | 0.487 |
| 34 | College of Notre Dame | 2-13 | 89.1 | 0.352 | 0.424 |
| 1Team Records: Only divisional games are included in the records here. The same holds true for the three ratings described below. 2Average Computer Rating: An equal weighting of two computer ratings, one based solely on goal differentials (with a 5-goal limit to greatly reduce any effects of "running up the score") and one based solely on wins and losses 3Ratings Percentage Index = 0.25 * team's record + 0.50 * opponent's record + 0.25 * opponent's-opponent's record 4Strength of Schedule = (2/3) * opponent's record + (1/3) * opponent's-opponent's record Notes
| |||||