FieldHockeyCorner.com

2006 Ratings as of November 19, 1:45 pm
by Average Computer Rating (ACR)

Division 3

South

Great Lakes  NE East  NE West  North Atlantic South South Atlantic    All

RankTeamRecord1ACR2RPI3SOS4
1Ursinus20-3 99.70.6870.627
2Salisbury17-4 99.20.6340.575
3Christopher Newport14-3 98.80.6690.618
4Johns Hopkins15-8 98.00.6030.586
5Lynchburg17-3 97.50.6040.522
6Catholic13-8 97.30.6040.599
7Muhlenberg12-7 97.20.5450.517
8Saint Mary's12-5 97.20.5720.527
9Gettysburg10-8 97.10.5630.566
10McDaniel10-9 96.70.5580.569
11Eastern Mennonite12-7 96.50.5400.509
12Mary Washington12-7 96.50.5500.523
13Washington & Lee14-6 96.40.5750.534
14Swarthmore9-8 96.20.5290.529
15Franklin & Marshall5-12 95.60.5070.578
16Dickinson7-10 95.60.5100.543
17York11-9 95.60.5000.484
18Virginia Wesleyan10-8 95.40.5030.486
19Washington & Jefferson11-7 95.00.5100.477
20Washington3-14 94.80.4670.564
21Randolph-Macon7-10 94.80.4760.497
22Frostburg State6-13 94.80.5090.574
23Haverford7-9 94.60.4640.473
24Bridgewater6-11 93.80.4490.482
25Villa Julie5-15 93.20.4320.492
26Roanoke3-11 93.10.4200.489
27Wilson9-8 92.50.3900.343
28Bryn Mawr3-15 92.50.3870.461
29Goucher1-14 92.40.3930.501
30Shenandoah3-7 92.10.4110.447
31College of Notre Dame4-11 91.40.4010.445
32Sweet Briar2-13 91.20.3550.429
33Randolph-Macon Woman's2-11 90.80.3430.406
34Hood3-11 90.40.2960.324
35Mary Baldwin0-11 88.10.2300.307

1Team Records: Only divisional games are included in the records here.  The same holds true for the three ratings described below.

2Average Computer Rating: An equal weighting of two computer ratings, one based solely on goal differentials (with a 5-goal limit to greatly reduce any effects of "running up the score") and one based solely on wins and losses

3Ratings Percentage Index = 0.25 * team's record + 0.50 * opponent's record + 0.25 * opponent's-opponent's record

4Strength of Schedule = (2/3) * opponent's record + (1/3) * opponent's-opponent's record

Notes
  • Click the column headers to sort the table by that field (in descending order for ratings and alphabetically for teams).


  • In the case of opponent's record in RPI and SOS, games involving the target team have been removed.


  • These calculations are provided only for entertainment purposes.  The SOS and ACR have no bearing on selection to the NCAA, while the NCAA's official RPI will be produced and published in October and November.


  • Formulas are constant across schools, allowing comparisons to be valid.


Home